From raw case to defensible consensus

Cases come in, de-identified

Your cases — images, clinical notes, model outputs, transcriptions — enter the pipeline stripped of PII. We scope the clinical question with you before any physician sees a case.

Verified physicians are assigned

Reviewers are licensed MDs whose credentials passed multi-stage screening (document review, identity checks, human verification). Where the task calls for it, profiles are matched to the specialty.

Each one answers blind

Multiple physicians review the same case independently. Nobody sees anyone else's verdict — no anchoring, no groupthink. Each verdict carries its own reasoning.

Verdicts become a consensus

Independent verdicts are reconciled statistically into a consensus label. Agreement is measured per item — not assumed. Chance-corrected agreement, not raw match rates.

Disagreement is adjudicated, not hidden

When physicians disagree, the case is flagged and escalated for adjudication. The final dataset records that it happened — disagreement is information, not noise to average away.

You receive an audit-ready dataset

Delivery includes every independent verdict, the consensus label, the agreement level and the adjudication flag, per row — the evidence trail a regulator or clinical advisor will ask about.